After Tuesday nights State Of The Union address to the nation in which President Bush outlined his goals in Iraq the Democrats claim that they support the troops at the same time threaten to cut the funding to our military.
As usual what comes out of the mouth of these liberals bogles the mind.They (the Democrats)then turn around and say that we support the War in Afghanistan but not the war in Iraq.This move is a tactical one often used by the former President Bill Clinton its called splitting the hairs.The media buys into it all the time but not us Conservative bloggers.
I was a Marine in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm back in 1990-1991 involved in the ground offensive up into Kuwait and nothing hurts the morale of a servicemen more than knowing that the Americans back home don't support us in combat.
This is true bipartisanship back in the mid to late 1990's when the United States was involved in the removal of former Communist dictator Slobodan Milosevic from the former Yugoslavia the Republican controlled federal legislature had no problem supporting at the time President Clinton and the troops under the banner of the United Nations.
So if the Republicans supported Clinton and our efforts back then why can't the Democrat dominated US House and US Senate support our initiatives in the war on terror as a whole not just in Afghanistan but also in Iraq?

for todays posting
David R.Beaupre

With the Democrat Presidential Sweepstakes opening with potential candidates the parties nominee from 2004 will not be running
in the field with them.
US Sen John F.Kerry (D-Ma) decided today that he will seek another term as junior US Sen from Massachusetts.Hopefully the Massachusetts Republican Party can come up with a viable candidate to unseat this lunatic liberal.
I can see why he's not running especially after getting his posterior handed to him by the reelection of President Bush back in 2004.
In ending it's a relief that he isn't running again but there are enough wacked out liberals already intending to put their hat into the ring.

For todays posting
David R.Beaupre

I hope that people around the country see that former Massachusetts Gov Mitt Romney is not the conservative that he says that he is.He's formed a Presidential exploritory Committee to raise cash for his campaign.
Yes he was a champion for tax cuts but as far as Party building he ran a bunch of candidates two years ago for the Massachusetts legislature none of whom won in fact it cost the GOP some votes in the legislature.
This country needs a Reagan type conservative but as we see in the coming days that there is hardly any out there for the GOP to rely on.

For todays posting
David R.Beaupre

Congradulations to Chicago Bears Head coach Lovey Smith and Indianapolis Colts head Tony Dungy for making it to the NFL World Championship game Super Bowl 41.
It seems that the mainstream media cares more about the skin color of these two great coaches than achievement of getting to the World Championship game in Miami.
It has been reported that this is the first time in NFL history that two Black American coaches (the media says African American)will face each other to determine football's World Champion.
But the liberal media should be more focused on the these two gentlemen who are for one both class acts and praised God for their victories.But the media was not to quick to say that they both praised God for their victories.
The media need to get over their fixation with always being politically correct and report the facts with out this bias day in and day out.

for todays posting
David R.Beaupre

Talk about big liberal Government intervention this one takes the cake.A Democrat Assembly member in the State of California (no surprise) Sally Lieber is about to bring forth legislation that if parents spank their children as a form of discipline those parents could face a fine and jail time.
The reason that Lieber gave for the proposal was "Such a law is needed because spanking victimizes helpless children and breeds violence in society."She also went on to say that"I think it's pretty hard to argue you need to beat a child."
First of all it has been reported that this woman doesn't even have children so it's easy for her to run her mouth when she's not even a parent.Second she's one of these PC police types that want to enforce big government on eveyone.
I have disciplined my two boys and yes spanking does work I never had to beat them.There's a difference between abusing a child and spanking them.
For all you liberals out there who believe that it hurts a childs self esteem well think again and get a life while you are at it.

For todays posting
David R.Beaupre