Well it happened it was only a matter of time before it did.That the liberal left wing anti-war Democrats gave up on Cindy Sheehan using her like a condom after sex for their own political sound bite agenda.
I still feel sad for Sheehan as a mother losing her son Casey Sheehan in the war in Iraq.But she was fair game for criticism from those who believe in what we are doing to bring freedom to a country that lived in tyranny under a purely evil diabolical dictator in Saddam Hussein.Despite what Cindy Sheehan says and believes her sons death was not in vain.Casey Sheehan is an American hero as are the many many members of our Armed Forces who serve in the danger areas over in Iraq and in Afghanistan who have died for this great country.
We need to vigilant to fight al-Qaeda and their cohorts in this war on terror.I just wish that people like Cindy Sheehan would understand this that the brainwashing that the left in this country has done to her has done her no good at all.

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre

This mornings lead oped in the New York Times shows how out of touch that they are in reference to the war on terror (and yes to you NYT lovers I include the war in Iraq).
The opening BS from the oped entitled "War Without End" begins in true Red Communist liberal NYT form "Never mind how badly the war is going in Iraq."Reports that I have heard (on Fox News that is) the surge has been working and that Iraqi military recruitment is up and up everyday does the NYT bother to report that though UMM no I don't think so.
They even go on to attack their own liberal buddies in the federal legislature "he cowed a wobbly coalition of Democrats into dropping their attempt to impose a time limit on his disastrous misadventure."The truth to be told the reason why these common sense thinking southern Democrats (ones who tend to be more conservative) are being attacked by the NYT is because the liberal left along with their moronic friends in the laimstream media like the NYT could not stuff this bill with prok-barrel spending as they tried to do the first time after Bush vetoed it.
Maybe if the media reported the truth of what is going on in Iraq instead of the bias whereas much BS spews out of their mouths then maybe as the NYT puts it "But we have grown accustomed to this presidents' disconnect from reality and his habit of tilting at straw men,like Americans who don't care about terrorism because they question his mismanagement of the war or don't worry about what will happen after the U.S. withdraws,as it inevitably must."The only reason why there are questions about the so called mismanagement of the war is because again the media refusing to report the truth about our brave military members puttting it all on the line for freedom.
You want to talk about a disconnect from reality where the NYT claims that Bush "fails to acknowledge that the Shiite-dominated government of Iraq is not a democracy and is at war with many of its own people."First of all who was in charge in the Iraqi government during the reign of terror under dictator Saddam Hussein and his Baathist party The Sunni Muslims who were connected all along with al-Qaeda.Did the NYT mention that in this mornings BS spewing I mean oped what the heck the same thing.
In the very next paragraph the NYT continue down the same old road of that there were no al-Qaeda before our invasion back in 2003."There is no doubt that organized Islamist terrorism-call it al-Qaeda or by any other name-is a dire threat.
Oh by the way for the record I need to correct the NYT AGAIN get the facts straight quit the political correctness game al-Qaeda means the "Base" in Arabic,not by any other name get it right.
"There is also no doubt that terrorists entered Iraq-mostly after the war began."HELLO! NYT GET OVER IT al-Qaeda was always in IRAQ even before the invasion HELLO!
In the last paragraph the NYT goes on to mention that Democrats tried to get a benchmark for troops withdrawal no its called the NYT/Liberal Democrat agenda of CUTTING AND RUNNING that all folks.

for todats posting

David R.Beaupre

Well we knew this was coming soon but not this soon but good for Elizabeth Hasselbeck.She was controversial to say the least I speak of Rosie o'Donnell with her liberal bias on a liberal left wing network kissing Barbra Walters butt everyday.
Her leaving the ABC show the view was a good thing.She calling our members of the military terrorists is one thing she is a true red Communist who hates the very soil that she walks on America.
I won't miss her and her big mouth I never really watched it just Fox News reported on Hannity&Colmes show.
Another liberal shot down in flames.Again Bye Bye Rosie you won't be missed by alot of people who used their heads.

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre

Finally they got their heads out of their anus cavity and voted for our troops for once the Democrats did.In the Senate it was a 80-13 vote in favor of it going to the Presidents desk for a signature soon.
But local Massachusetts Congressmen in the House all 10 voted against funding our troops no surprise there.Especially my Congressman John Tierney (D-Salem,Mass) as usual an embarrassmant to this state and our 6th Congressional District he is nothing but a Communist liberal big Government hack.

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre

When it comes to politics "My Political Opinion" this blog wants to be fair down the line.When I see hacks from either side of the asile I call it as I see it.I am a Conservative before I am a Republican especially in this state the Communistwealth Of Taxachusetts.
But now I need to go off on those out there who claim to be a Conservative Republican.I know the old saying from the greatest President Ronald Reagan who mandated the 11th Commandment "thou shall not speak evil of another Republican."This was said long before the RINO's came out (Republican In Name Only) or a new phrase closet Conservatives.
Todays GOP are very weak Ronald Reagan would be ashamed to be associated with such a group of hacks.Even the so called Republican Presidential Candidates claim to be as Conservative as a Ronald Reagan but don't even come close none of the current 10 candidates.
The new slogan for the GOP should say "NEED CONSERVATIVES FOR OFFICE WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE."

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre