This mornings New York Times lead oped is entitled "Hunger and Food Stamps."To begin with I have nothing against people receiving public assistance as long as it is not abused as it is more times than none.
We live in the most prosperous and greatest nation on God's green earth along with the most generous one at that.The NYT this morning makes it seem as if we just came out of the Great depression.They also blame the Government for not doing enough to properly fund the federal food stamp program.
How about this common sense suggestion, instead of wasting tax payer money on big Government programs such as food stamps (as liberals and the NYT advocate for) persuade people to find jobs and work hard for a living.
Another way that this could be achieved is by getting rid of these illegal immigrants out of our country (undocumented immigrants for those of you out there who are moonbats and politically correct I don't want to offend you NOT!).
In ending this morning later in the oped the NYT goes on to say "Democrats and Republicans alike must realize that improving food stamps is a moral and economic necessity."
Umm excuse me when ever has the NYT believed in morals,Can anyone tell me please?They believe in abortion on demand killing babies in other words and they are against the just war in Iraq helping a truely impoverished nation towards Democracy after years of torment under an evil dictator in Saddam Hussein.And as far as an economic necessity please the NYT believes as well as the libertals in this country that the way to economic prosperity is through taxation and big Government programs for those who can get off thier butts to work which is also called the redistribution of wealth.

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre

Its a good thing that this terrorist attack was thwarted this past week in New Jersey.This is a great reason why illegal immigrants need to leave this country,it has been reported that some of the terrorists that were caught were illegally here and even brought here from Albania from the late to mid 1990's while the prior Clinton Administration had what was left of our military at the time (that of which that was not chopped up by Clinton) over in Europe of course fighting in a conflict that had no U.S. interests.Tell that to the Clintonites today they have no answer but they attack the current Bush administration for going into Iraq as part of the war on terror which has always been an interest to the United States.
This is another reason why Congress needs to keep in tact the USA Patriot Act as a law to help security in this nation strong otherwise we are doomed to failure.

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre

Today a the Constitutional Convention in the Massachusetts legislature they didnot even vote on the marriage amendment brought forward from the last Legislative session in order to put it on the 2008 ballot for us the citizens to vote on.
They let us down again typical liberals as always notrhing changes in Massachusetts.reports were made after the vote that it will be voted on in June.Don't hold your breath.
One can only wonder what excuses will be made for the measure not to come up.

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre

According to a report yesterday the Associated Press was reporting from France that (as they had to put in Bold type France elects conservative as new prez) a man by the name of Nicolas Sarkozy a pro American conservative who defeated a socialist oh what the heck a Communist candidate a woman by the name of Segolene Royal who like unfortunately our own US Sen Hillary Clinton (D-NY) failed to become France's first woman President.Let's hope and pray that the same happens to Hillary.
In true liberal biased fashion the AP could not hold back on calling Sarkozy a charismatic but divisive figure known for uncompromising even brutal language.
A little late if you ask me but Thank God that the French have finally pulled their collective heads from their backsides and smartened up politically.
The media back here have always reported on how the Bush Administration has embarrassed our nation to the rest of the world.Well this just proves once again as many many times before on how the media even though they have a right "freedom of the press" is so so wrong.
I hate to gloat but I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

for todays posting and a happy one at that

David R.Beaupre

Can someone tell me why doesn't the NYT understand that US ATTORNEYS SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!No matter which political party has control of the Executive branch of our Government.
From it's opening salvo the oped entitled "The Scandal That Keeps Growing" mentions that US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales wants to change the subject on the recent firings of the US Attorneys in the Justice Department.The NYT accuses Gonzales of playing politics with the firings Gonzales rightly stated that he can't just focus on the firings with the workload he has as AG.
I love it how the NYT tries to sound bipartisan by stating that the fired US Attorneys were terminated because they were investigating powerful Republicans and refused to bring baseless charges against Democrats.
Towards the end of the oped the NYT called for what else is new leading the charge for the President to fire Gonzales.Hey liberals at the NYT don't hold your collective breath on that one.In the very last sentence of the oped it states that "It is the duty of Congress to compel them and other officials to finally tell the truth to the American people.Umm excuse me editorial board members and PINCHY boy at the NYT you all over there would not know the truth in anything if it hit you square in the head dead on.

for todays posting

David R.Beaupre